What if my oncologist doesn’t recommend ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA?
What if my oncologist doesn’t recommend ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA?
Refuting Oncologist’s Doubts About Radioligand Therapy: A Case for Confidence
As ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy gains attention for its role in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), some oncologists remain hesitant to fully embrace it. Their concerns, while understandable, are often based on regulatory, safety, and patient selection uncertainties. However, a growing body of evidence and clinical experience suggests that many of these doubts are unfounded, and it’s time to address them head-on.
- Regulatory Approval: Procedural Lag & Geographic Differences
While ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA (Pluvicto© by Novartis) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a late-stage treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, one of the most frequent arguments against the widespread adoption of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy is the lack of formal approval at earlier stages. Without regulatory approval, oncologists express concerns over the absence of established inclusion criteria and treatment guidelines. However, this objection overlooks several important factors:
- Precedent from Lutathera: Radioligand therapy (RLT) is not a new concept. ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera©), a similar radioligand treatment for neuroendocrine tumors, was approved by the EMA in 2017 and by the FDA in 2018 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease that is unresectable or progressive. Its success set a clear path for the approval of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA. The PSMA-targeted approach is based on the same theranostic principle, combining diagnosis and therapy, and has benefited from nearly a decade of clinical application in countries like Germany. This track record builds confidence in its therapeutic framework.
- Flexible Access: While the medical regulatory framework in the US is stricter, many countries have developed a more flexible and patient-centred approach, where doctors have greater medical liberty to recommend treatments based on individual patient needs, such as intolerance to chemotherapy or hormonal treatments. This approach has greatly expanded access to ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA, even at earlier disease stages. The accumulated experience has been invaluable in refining patient selection criteria and demonstrating safety in real-world clinical settings. Germany, for instance, has led the charge in integrating this therapy into their prostate cancer treatment landscape at various stages with highly promising results.
- Clinical Trials: Rigorous clinical trials, including PSMAfore and UpFrontPSMA, continue to accumulate robust data on the safety and efficacy of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA. These studies are critical to advancing the therapy to earlier stages, and their outcomes support the use of this therapy as a front-line option in patients with high PSMA expression.
- Adverse Effects: Manageable and Comparable to Conventional Therapies
Concerns over adverse effects, particularly nephrological and haematological toxicities such as microangiopathy or thrombocytopenia, are often cited by oncologists as reasons to hesitate in applying ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy. However, the data we have thus far indicates that the side effect profile is not only manageable but, in many cases, far less severe than that associated with conventional treatments like chemotherapy and external radiation. Besides, in such a disease as cancer “it is not reasonable to define absolute contra-indications. In general, the chances to improve should outweigh the risks of harming a patient.” [1]
- High Precision: The key advantage of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA, or any radioligand therapy for that matter, is its ability to selectively target cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue, reducing off-target effects. Chemotherapy, on the other hand, has a well-known systemic impact, causing fatigue, nausea, and significant haematologic side effects such as neutropenia and anaemia, which can be far more debilitating. Similarly, external radiation can lead to localized damage to healthy organs surrounding the tumor. In contrast, ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA’s targeted approach minimizes these risks and actually improves the quality of life, as demonstrated in multiple trials and compassionate use settings.
The main challenge is the natural presence of PSMA enzymes in other organs like the salivary glands. The name "Prostate" in PSMA (Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen) is to an extent misleading; while this enzyme was indeed first discovered on the surface of normal prostate cells, it is actually present in greater numbers in other organs. The most common side effect after ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy is xerostomia or dry mouth. However, studies and experience have shown that this is mostly transient and reversible and is far outweighed by the therapeutic benefits. Moreover, doctors have developed prophylactic precautions to mitigate these expected side-effects by accompanying intravenous saline infusions to maintain sufficient hydration and if needed protective co-medication.
- Unclear Source of Side Effects: Given that most novel therapeutic approaches first involve late-stage, heavily pre-treated patients, it is difficult to definitively attribute some side effects like thrombocytopenia to the therapy itself or to the progression of advanced cancer. In fact, there is growing evidence that administering ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA earlier in the disease course — before patients undergo multiple rounds of chemotherapy or hormonal treatment — could reduce the incidence of side effects and further enhance the therapeutic effect, as healthier bone marrow and immune systems are better equipped to tolerate the therapy and even combat the cancer weakened by it.
- Patient Selection Criteria: Gaining Consensus
Another area of ongoing debate is how to best select patients for ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy. Some oncologists argue that without universal criteria, treatment protocols will remain inconsistent, leading to variable outcomes. However, the selection process for ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy is actually clearer than for many other treatments. The field is, after all, called "theranostics" for a reason.
- PSMA PET Imaging: PSMA enzyme first established itself as a diagnostic target. The integration of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging as part of the pre-treatment assessment protocol was a game-changer. It enables the detection of micrometastases that are not “visible” with traditional diagnostic methods such as ¹⁸F-FDG or scintigraphy, ensuring precise staging of the disease. This imaging modality provides a detailed evaluation of PSMA expression, ensuring that only patients with high uptake are considered for therapy. In fact, “PSMA-PET (or PSMA-SPECT) is a strong and relative unique factor for prediction of an individual patient’s response probability to 177Lu-PSMA-RLT.”1 As more institutions adopt this tool, patient selection will become more consistent, and variability in treatment outcomes will decrease.
- Experience in Germany and Australia: Countries like Germany and Australia, which have been at the forefront of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA research and application, have accumulated a wealth of experience over the past decade. This experience shows that selecting patients based on PSMA expression and prior treatment history leads to highly effective outcomes. Not for nothing is it called "personalized medicine".
- The Case for Early Intervention
UpFrontPSMA and PSMAfore trials, have shown that the earlier ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA is introduced, the better the outcomes, with a more significant reduction in PSA levels and fewer long-term side effects compared to later-stage applications.
Conclusion: Confidence in a Proven Modality
While concerns about regulatory approval, side effects, and patient selection are valid in any new therapy, the evidence surrounding ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy strongly supports its safety and efficacy. With over a decade of experience in several countries, ongoing trials, and the successful application of similar therapies like Lutathera, the case for radioligand therapy as a standard-of-care option is compelling. If your oncologist is still hesitant, feel free to put them in touch with us. Cancer requires an interdisciplinary approach.
Bibliography
177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Initial 254-patient results from a prospective registry (REALITY Study). Khreish F, Ghazal Z, Marlowe RJ, Rosar F, Sabet A, Maus S, Linxweiler J, Bartholomä M, Ezziddin S. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb;49(3):1075-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05525-7. Epub 2021 Sep 7. PMID: 34494131; PMCID: PMC8803625.
[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-Radioligand Therapy Efficacy Outcomes in Taxane-Naïve Versus Taxane-Treated Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Swayamjeet Satapathy, Ranjit K. Sahoo, Chandrasekhar Bal, Journal of Nuclear Medicine May 2023, 265414; DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.26541
Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Functional Effects of 225Ac- and 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapies (RLTs) on Salivary Glands. Feuerecker, Benedikt & Gafita, Andrei & Langbein, Thomas & Tauber, Robert & Seidl, Christof & Bruchertseifer, Frank & Gschwendt, Jürgen & Weber, Wolfgang & D'Alessandria, Calogero & Morgenstern, Alfred & Eiber, Matthias. (2023). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24. 16845. 10.3390/ijms242316845.
Extensive 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Can Lead to Radiation Nephropathy with a Renal Thrombotic Microangiopathy–like Picture. Schäfer, Hannah & Mayr, Sarah & Büttner, Maike & Knorr, Karina & Steinhelfer, Lisa & Böger, Carsten & Gschwend, Jürgen & Heemann, Uwe & Eiber, Matthias & Schmaderer, Christoph & Tauber, Robert. (2022). European Urology. 83. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.025.
Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use of 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand-therapy (177Lu-PSMA-RLT). Kratochwil, Clemens & Fendler, Wolfgang & Eiber, Matthias & Hofman, Michael & Emmett, Louise & Calais, Jeremie & Osborne, Joseph & Iravani, Amir & Koo, Phillip & Lindenberg, Liza & Baum, Richard P. & Bozkurt, Murat & Delgado Bolton, Roberto C. & Ezziddin, Samer & Forrer, Flavio & Hicks, Rodney & Hope, Thomas & Kabasakal, Levent & Konijnenberg, Mark & Hermann, Ken. (2023). European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 50. 10.1007/s00259-023-06255-8.
Long-Term Nephrotoxicity of 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy. Steinhelfer, Lisa & Lunger, Lukas & Cala, Lisena & Pfob, Christian & Lapa, Constantin & Hartrampf, Philipp & Buck, Andreas & Schäfer, Hannah & Schmaderer, Christoph & Tauber, Robert & Brosch-Lenz, Julia & Haller, Bernhard & Meissner, Valentin & Knorr, Karina & Weber, Wolfgang & Eiber, Matthias. (2023). Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 65. jnumed.123.265986. 10.2967/jnumed.123.265986.
Safety and Efficacy of [177Lu]-PSMA-I&T Radioligand Therapy in Octogenarians with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Report on 80 Patients over the Age of 80 Years. Tauber R, Knorr K, Retz M, Rauscher I, Grigorascu S, Hansen K, D'Alessandria C, Wester HJ, Gschwend J, Weber W, Eiber M, Langbein T. J Nucl Med. 2023 Aug;64(8):1244-1251. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265259. Epub 2023 Jun 15. PMID: 37321824.
[1] Joint EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline for the use of 177Lu-labeled PSMA-targeted radioligand-therapy